Toll Free: 0120-3134355
Office hours: Mon – Sat, 10:30 AM – 5:30 PM (except holidays)
Current time (IST):
Legal guides & case management insights

Practical legal explainers for real-world matters.

Legal Fox India empowers you with expert articles that break down matrimonial, civil, criminal, and corporate legal issues into simple, actionable steps.

25+ in-depth guides across core practice areas Updated with recent amendments & leading judgments Written with advocates on our panel
Dec 17, 2025 Criminal Law / Bail Jurisprudence / Delhi High Court New Delhi

Delhi High Court Objects to Trial Court Granting Bail While Bail Plea Was Pending Before High Court

The Delhi High Court has raised serious objections to a trial court granting bail despite a bail application being pending before the High Court, observing that such parallel proceedings undermine judicial discipline and may lead to forum shopping and conflicting orders under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Dec 17, 2025 Constitutional Law / Defamation Law / Media & Speech / Delhi High Court New Delhi

Delhi High Court Urges Sanju Verma to Withdraw “Blot on Uniform” Remark Against Former IPS Officer Yashovardhan Azad

The Delhi High Court has urged social media commentator Sanju Verma to withdraw her “blot on the uniform” remark against former IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad, observing that while free speech is protected under Article 19(1)(a), it must be balanced with the right to reputation under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Dec 17, 2025 Constitutional Law / Human Rights / Litigation / High Courts Chennai

Madras High Court Directs Centre to Frame Policy to Assist Indians Abroad, Invokes Rajadharma

The Madras High Court has directed the Union Government to consider framing a comprehensive policy to assist Indians abroad, invoking constitutional duties under Article 21 and the ancient principles of Rajadharma as explained by Kautilya and Manu, emphasising the State’s obligation to protect its citizens beyond national borders.

Dec 13, 2025 Service Law / Employment Law / Supreme Court / Litigation New Delhi

Those Who Accept Compassionate Appointment Cannot Later Claim Higher Post: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a person who accepts compassionate appointment cannot later demand a higher post as a matter of right, reiterating that compassionate employment is a limited exception meant for immediate financial relief and cannot override regular recruitment rules under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Dec 13, 2025 Labour & Employment Law / Industrial Disputes / Delhi High Court New Delhi

Airline Pilots Are ‘Workmen’ Under Industrial Disputes Act Irrespective of Salary: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that airline pilots can qualify as “workmen” under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 regardless of salary, reiterating that the dominant nature of duties—rather than pay or designation—determines coverage under labour welfare legislation.

Dec 13, 2025 Securities Law / SEBI / Corporate Litigation New Delhi

SEBI Clears Adani Group Executives in Insider Trading Probe Linked to SB Energy Deal

EBI has cleared Adani Group executives in an insider trading investigation related to the SB Energy acquisition, concluding that there was insufficient evidence to establish trading while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, in line with settled principles under the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.

Dec 12, 2025 Tax & Customs / Aviation Law / Litigation / Delhi High Court New Delhi

IndiGo Moves Delhi High Court Seeking Refund of Over ₹900 Crore Customs Duty on Re-import of Aircraft Parts

IndiGo has approached the Delhi High Court seeking refund of over ₹900 crore allegedly paid as customs duty on re-import of aircraft parts sent abroad for repair and maintenance. The petition raises issues under Section 20 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the scope of exemptions for re-imported goods, with broader implications for airlines and the MRO ecosystem.

Dec 12, 2025 Property Law / Waqf Law / Supreme Court / Litigation New Delhi / Kerala (Munambam, Ernakulam

Supreme Court Stays Kerala High Court Ruling in Munambam Land Dispute, Orders Status Quo

The Supreme Court has stayed the Kerala High Court’s finding that the disputed Munambam land is not Waqf property and directed all parties to maintain status quo. The interim relief prevents any change in the nature, possession, or title of the land while the Court examines the legal and evidentiary issues under the Waqf Act, 1995.

Dec 12, 2025 Family Law / Divorce & Maintenance / Supreme Court New Delhi

Supreme Court Commends Woman for Waiving Alimony in Mutual Divorce Settlement

The Supreme Court granted divorce by mutual consent and appreciated a woman for voluntarily not seeking alimony, noting that such amicable settlements are rare today. The Court also ensured that the waiver was informed, voluntary, and free from coercion before closing all disputes.

Dec 12, 2025 Litigation / Technology Law / Personality Rights New Delhi

Delhi High Court Directs Google, Meta and X to Remove Fake Content Misusing Sunil Gavaskar’s Identity

The Delhi High Court has directed Google, Meta and X (formerly Twitter) to promptly act on former cricketer Sunil Gavaskar’s requests to take down fake and misleading online content misusing his name, photographs and identity, reinforcing personality rights protection in the digital space.

Nov 27, 2025 GST Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court: Legal Heir Not Liable for Deceased’s GST Dues Without Proof of Business Continuity

Jharkhand High Court: Legal Heir Not Liable for Deceased’s GST Dues Without Proof of Business Continuity Case: Rishi Shangari v. Union of India W.P.(T) No. 523 of 2023 — Judgment dated April 15, 2025 (Jharkhand High Court) The Jharkhand High Court recently set aside a demand order issued against a legal heir for recovery of GST dues belonging to his deceased father. The Court held that a son cannot be made liable for the tax liabilities of a deceased proprietor unless the department produces clear evidence that the legal heir continued the same business after the death of the original taxpayer. The ruling clarifies an important principle under Section 93(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, which places liability on a legal representative only when the same business is carried on after the death of the proprietor.